Securities Fraud And Business Lawsuit Information

Zicam Investor Lawsuit News

Zicam Investor Lawsuit

Supreme Court Ruling on Matrixx

zicam investor lawsuitIn a narrow judgment, the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that the class-action lawsuit filed by investors against Matrixx Initiatives Inc can proceed, declaring that the plaintiffs had shown enough of a claim for the case to go forward. The court ruling deals the pharmaceutical company a big defeat, declaring that the drugmaker had failed to reveal initial reports of adverse side effects from its Zicam remedy.

The Supreme Court of the United States has rejected limits to lawsuits against drug makers. The court ruled in favor of investors, who had filed a securities fraud class action against the manufacturer of the now-discontinued Zicam nasal cold remedies, alleging that the company violated the §10(b) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule10b–5 by concealing 23 reports of people who had complained of loss of sense of smell after using Zicam as early 2004.

The investors alleged that the pharmaceutical company issued misleading statements on the possible link between Zicam Cold Remedy and loss of sense of smell. The U.S. Supreme Court judgment gives shareholders more leeway to file a lawsuit against pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for not disclosing reports of dangerous side effects of drugs manufactured by them.
In a unanimous judgment, the justices ruled that the petitioners had every right to be informed of the side effects of the Zicam nasal spray and gel, manufactured by Matrixx. The judges declared that Matrixx should defend against these accusations of fraud, which claimed that it failed to disclose the side effects of its spray and gel. The high court ruled that, under the federal securities law, even less definitive evidence of side effects is enough to require disclosure.

The lawsuit also cites nine other lawsuits filed by people affected by recalled Zicam nasal products from October 2003 to January 2004, alleging that the drug maker either omitted or concealed material information about the safety of the Zicam products. Numerous consumer lawsuits have also been filed against the pharmaceutical company for “product liability, negligence, fraud, and breach of warranties.”

The Supreme Court ruling has made it easier for investors to take pharmaceutical companies court for deliberately withholding information about a drug or product.

Read more: Zicam Investor Lawsuit News

Countrywide Lawsuit

Countrywide Lawsuit

Bank of America subsidiary Countrywide financial has been hit with another lawsuit for misrepresenting the quality of securities it had been selling to investors prior to the financial melt down.

The lawsuit filed by a group of investors that include New York Life Insurance Co. as well as TIAA-CREF accuses Bank Of America of massive fraud related to the sale of mortgage securities.

The investors behind the lawsuit were led to believe that they were purchasing conservative investments that posed very little risk instead of the high risk loans that eventually led to significant losses for the investors.

Read more: Countrywide Lawsuit

CellCyte Genetics Faces lawsuit claims

CellCyte Genetics said it will "defend itself vigorously" against three shareholder lawsuits filed this week, and announced it has hired Philadelphia-based law firm Duane Morris.

The suits allege executives and outside shareholders of the small biotechnology company artificially inflated its stock price and defrauded investors by making misleading claims.

Read more: CellCyte Genetics Faces lawsuit claims

Oppenheimer Funds Savings Lawsuit

Oppenheimer Funds Savings Lawsuit
Oregon Attorney General John Kroger along with Treasurer Ben Westlund has taken action on behalf of the people of Oregon by filing a lawsuit in hopes of recovering investment losses in the Oppenheimer Funds 529 as well as Oregon College Savings plans. The $36.2 million lawsuit filed on Monday names : Oppenheimer Funds ,

Read more: Oppenheimer Funds Savings Lawsuit

Free Case Review

Free Case Review
  1. Your Name:(*)
    Please check your name for errors.
  2. E-mail Address:(*)
    Please provide your valid email address
  3. Phone Number:
    Invalid Input
  4. Street Address:
    Invalid Input
  5. City:
    Invalid Input
  6. State, Select Your State From The List:
    Invalid Input
  7. Zip Code:(*)
    Invalid Zip Code. Please enter your US Zip code.
  8. Method you prefer we use to contact you?
    Invalid Input
  9. General Case Information Please briefly explain your situation:(*)
    Please let us know your message.
  10. By submitting this inquiry I agree that the information that I will receive in response to the above question is general information and I will not be charged for the response to this e-mail question. I also agree that the above does not constitute a request for legal advice and that I am not forming an attorney client relationship by submitting this question. I understand that I may only retain an attorney by entering into an agreement, and that I am not hereby entering into an agreement by submitting my question.

Recent Lawsuits